Angry About Rape
Angry Harry Replies to a Woman Correspondent
K: If a man wanders alone into a dangerous area where gangs are known to operate, and is brutally beaten... should he be told it's his fault because he shouldn't have been acting so unsafely?
AH: If a man knows that he is doing something that is likely to lead to an unhappy circumstance, then he deserves less sympathy should that unhappy circumstance arise.
People must bear some responsibility for the outcomes of their actions. This is the only way in which the world can operate properly.
Indeed, insurance companies will not insure your goods if you do not take proper care to secure them. And I imagine that if you kept going up to black men and tweaking them on the nose saying "Hi Nig###!" I doubt that a judge will be very sympathetic towards you over the occasional beatings you might receive. He will assume that you bear some responsibility for what has happened to you. And, in my view, the same should be true when it comes to matters of sex-assault.
It is all a question of degree.
Many women, however, seem to wish to take no responsibility for their behaviour. They seem to think that they should be able to flaunt their sexuality all over the place in order to incite men and then they think that they have the right to claim that they are victims when some men respond to them in a manner which is absolutely consistent with the message that they, themselves, have been sending out.
In my view, women who set out to entice men sexually bear more responsibility for sexual assaults against them than do women who do not set out to entice men sexually. And this should be reflected in the law.
K: Why should a woman NOT have the right to wear what she pleases?
AH: For the same reason that men do not go to work with their dicks hanging out of their trousers.
I tell you what; try wearing a Nazi helmet whenever you go out. See if other women agree with your right to wear what you want.
Furthermore, since you are soooooooo concerned about rape, should you not be advising women to dress more carefully, rather than promoting the opposite?
K: Are men such animals that if they see a woman dressed provocatively, they'll have no choice but to rape her?
AH: That is a stupid question. And so...
Are women such sluts that they think that they are entitled to foist their sexuality on to every passing member of the public?
Are women so mind-boggling stupid that they cannot see that flagrantly enticing men sexually might bring about consequences?
What makes women think that they have the right to overtly sexually stimulate men who happen to be in the vicinity whereas if men did a similar thing in response perhaps with their hands they could be prosecuted?
When women stick out their sexual organs uninvited into men's vision then this is not much different from men sticking out their hands uninvited for a grope. After all, in both cases they are merely trying to elicit a sexual response in the other party in the best way that they know how.
Let me put it this way. You do not have the right to wind me up sexually at your convenience particularly so if I would get into trouble for responding even marginally to your enticement; i.e. to what I might see as your 'request'.
K: Are men unable to merely look and enjoy the view without having to have sex with her?
AH: Another stupid question. And so...
Many men do not enjoy the view. They do not like being sexually harassed. And my guess and it is only a guess is that in some instances where strangers rape provocatively-dressed women, they are doing so in order to teach them a lesson of some sort. They are saying, "Stop fu#cking around with my private and personal emotions." They are saying, "I see. So you want to turn me on without my permission, eh? Then let's see how you like it."
My guess is that they also do not like being taunted and provoked. They do not like 'sluts' continually dangling their juicy bits in front of them and saying, "But you can't have them," any more than you would like men dangling $10,000 bills in front of your nose wherever you go and saying, "Sorry, Honey, you aren't good looking enough for this kind of money."
Indeed, many men that I know are angered by the way in which women purposely provoke them by their clothing. And they are not prudes. They are not anti-porn, or anti-wild sex, or what have you, but they do not want unattainable sexually-provocative women stuck in their faces uninvited.
Others, like my good self, are more than happy to see women strutting their stuff.
But I do not think that women should presume that all men must be made to feel the same way by some feminist decree. And I also do not see why women should feel that men are not entitled to feel offended by uninvited sexual displays.
Is it only women who can be offended in today's society?
Are men not permitted to feel offended?
Besides which, I know many women who do not appreciate the presence of sexually-provocative women in their midst.
Furthermore, we all have to accept that in order to safeguard our liberties, we have to tolerate many dysfunctional and/or unstable beings in our society, as well as those who are temporarily 'unbalanced' for one reason or another. The alternative, in practice, is truly horrible. And, of course, some 20% of males have very low IQs. As such, I think that women are as seems typical these days being incredibly selfish if they believe that they are entitled to swirl up the passions of whomsoever they wish and then escape all responsibility for any negative consequences that might arise from the wrong kind of attention.
In a nutshell: People who go out of their way to provoke "an attack" are less deserving should an attack materialise than those who do not.
Most people would agree with this.
But Western women see themselves as so superior that they think they should be above such things. And they think that they should be able to provoke men all men as much as they like and then take no responsibility!
(And this is true not just in the area of sex. It is true in many other areas.)
'Ollocks, I say.
Their own behaviour must be taken into account.
And, take it from me, it soon will be!