Friday was the first anniversary of the 7/7 suicide bombings in London, so let’s take a good look at Madrid. Why Madrid? Because the train-bombing there helps to illustrate how Jews are wrecking the West. The Jewish scorpion has two claws and Spain was crushed first by the right claw, then by the left. When the bombs went off on 11th March 2004, killing 192 people, Spain was run by a right-wing government under José María Aznar, who’d fully supported the war for Israel in Iraq. The first reaction of his government, as you’d expect from an ally of Bush and Blair, was to lie. It tried to place the blame on the Basque terrorists ETA and was duly punished at the Spanish general election three days later.
Dying for Israel
Left: In Iraq. Right: In Spain.
But Spanish Whites broke free of the right claw of the Jewish scorpion only to throw themselves into the left claw – a socialist government under José Luis Zapatero. The new government immediately set about dismantling Spain for the benefit of niggers, naggers and faggots. It increased non-white immigration hugely and passed destructive new laws demanded by feminists and homosexuals. Spanish Whites are now watching extinction get closer by the day and they will have to stamp on the Jewish scorpion’s head if they want to survive: neither a right-wing nor a left-wing government will help them, because both are run by Jews and Jew-puppets for Jews. The left-wing Zapatero wants to build a Marxist paradise that “accepts all immigrants” and admits no difference between White and non-white, male and female, heterosexual and homosexual. Meanwhile, the defeated right-wing prime minister Aznar has accepted a highly lucrative job from the Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch.
Jews to the left of him, Jews to the right of him:
Ariel Sharon, Rupert Murdoch, Peter Chernin
Like all White race-traitors, Murdoch knows that he has to honor and obey Jews to get the money and power that are so important to him. His “famously liberal” Jewish deputy Peter Chernin makes sure he continues to walk the Jewish line, like the two British politicians presently competing for Murdoch’s support: Tony Blair of New Labour and David Cameron of the Conservatives. The difference between Britain and Spain is that in Britain the Jewish scorpion has both of its claws at work simultaneously: JuLabour and the Kikey-Cons support both the Iraq war and unlimited immigration. And just like Spain, Britain has been rewarded for its obedience to the Jews. On 7th July 2005, four members of our vibrant Muslim community vibrated themselves and 52 others to death in London. Just like Aznar, Bliar tried to lie his way out of trouble. He claimed that the suicide-bombings had nothing to do with his war for Israel in Iraq.
This was obviously untrue, but the London suicide-bombings in themselves don’t prove the war was wrong. No, they simply reveal another deadly flaw in mass immigration. Britain’s large and growing Muslim population wanted to exercise a veto over part of our foreign policy. They failed and huge numbers of them now bear a very big grudge. In other words, Britain can no longer act freely and easily in its own interest: it has to take account of what the aliens within its borders will say and do. Of course, the war in Iraq was in Israel’s interest rather than Britain’s, but if it had in fact been in our interest the same problem would have arisen.
Not that Bliar had to worry much about it. He followed Jewish orders and went to war in Iraq knowing that he would have the best security British tax-payers’ money can buy. The victims of the suicide-bombings in London didn’t have dozens of bodyguards and intelligence agents looking after them as Bliar does, but they won’t be the last to suffer for his lies and deceit:
Al-Qaeda sympathisers have been trying to infiltrate the British security service MI5, the BBC has learned. Whitehall officials confirmed what some had long suspected. But those with al-Qaeda sympathies were weeded out during a six to eight-month vetting process, officials added [with their fingers crossed]. Meanwhile anti-terrorism police probing the 7 July London bombings say people who knew the attacks were being planned would face prosecution.
Officers at a Scotland Yard briefing said they continued to be very concerned by the intelligence picture, with 70 investigations continuing and some of the information received described as “very sinister.” The head of the Metropolitan Police’s anti-terrorist branch said 60 people were awaiting trial in the UK for terrorist-related offences. But he warned: “This is unprecedented, and the flow of new cases shows no sign of abating – if anything it is accelerating.” MI5 believes, from polls, that around 400,000 people in the UK are “sympathetic to violent jihad around the world.” (BBC News, 3rd July 2006)
Isn’t that great? Britain’s Jew-directed politicians have spent decades stamping hard on White “racism” and lavishing love and money on the aliens in our midst, and look at the results. 400,000 of those aliens – at the very least – would like to see Britain destroyed. Oh, and 13% of British Muslims questioned in a poll for The Times said that the London bombers were “martyrs.” Only the very naïve would believe that the other 87% were all telling the truth when they disagreed. More than a year before the bombings, four members of a radical Muslim group called al-Muhajiroun had spoken to a London newspaper like this:
Four young British Muslims in their twenties – a social worker, an IT specialist, a security guard and a financial adviser – occupy a table at a fast-food chicken restaurant in Luton. Perched on their plastic chairs, wolfing down their dinner, they seem just ordinary young men. Yet out of their mouths pour heated words of revolution. “As far as I’m concerned, when they bomb London, the bigger the better,” says Abdul Haq. “I know it’s going to happen because Sheikh bin Laden said so. Like Bali, like Turkey, like Madrid – I pray for it, I look forward to the day.”
Sayful and his friends laugh at the idea that they are local pariahs. “The mosques say one thing to the public, and something else to us. Let’s just say that the face you see and the face we see are two different faces,” says Abdul Haq. “Believe me,” adds Musa, “behind closed doors, there are no moderate Muslims.” They also mock the idea that they are attracted to al-Muhajiroun because they have suffered alienation from white society. “Do we look like scum?” they ask. “Do we look illiterate?” (London Evening Standard, 20th April 2004)
Ah, yes, that oh-so-puzzling question of what motivates “ordinary blokes” born and bred in Britain to turn against their “homeland” so violently. It’s been pondered deeply by Brendan O’Neill of the Spiked collective, which is controlled by the Jewish sociologist Frank Furedi. Brendan’s conclusion? That the suicide-bombings needn’t concern us overmuch:
The truth appears to be that 7/7 was meaningless; it was a nihilistic attack carried out by four fairly ordinary blokes for no easily discernible aim or agenda. And tragically, those who died in it may as well have been killed by an earthquake or in a train crash. It is time to stop trying to read meaning into 7/7, and get over it. (Spiked-online, 16th May 2006)
Hmmm. Well, I hate to contradict a former Trotskyist, but I can’t agree with his thoughtful conclusion that those “four fairly ordinary blokes” were confused nihilists who, for “no easily discernible” reason, decided to blow themselves up rather than put on a Beckett season at their local mosque. No, I think the London bombings had a very plain meaning: Hatred. The “Fantastic Four” hated us because they were in Britain but not of Britain. Their race and religion don’t belong here and never will, so they turned to radical Islam to fill their existential void (Britain’s Hindus and Sikhs, although bad for us in other ways, don’t behave like this because their religions aren’t totalitarian and power-hungry in the way that Islam is). The problem of personal meaning and purpose didn’t face the first generation of Muslim immigrants because they already had a secure identity forged in nations where their race and religion did belong. But that doesn’t mean they weren’t grateful to escape from those nations. This is a Muslim writing in a British magazine as the first anniversary of 7/7 approached:
[A]n Afghan taxi-driver told me that he could not understand the actions of the young Muslim men who demonstrated against the cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed and carried placards that clearly said, “Kill all those who insult Islam.” He told me, “These kids have never lived in a war zone, they have never been in a country where you are persecuted for your religion and have no rights at all, where there is no support from the government to help you get food, education and healthcare, and where religious tolerance and democracy do not exist. I’ve managed to come to this country and I feel like I am the luckiest man in the world. I thank God every day for bringing me to this country.“ (The Spectator, 1st July 2006)
But Afghan taxi-drivers, no matter how grateful, are not good for Britain. They bring with them the culture and racial characteristics that caused Afghanistan’s intolerance and poverty, and even if their gratitude lasts, their children will not share it. Britain has been a good place to live because it has been a White Christian nation, and as it ceases to be a White Christian nation it will cease to be a good place to live.
The London bombing was a very good example of that, which is why Britain’s Jews and race-traitors have done their best to conceal its true meaning. The commemoration of the first anniversary, as you’d expect, was thoroughly multi-cultural and politically correct. The London Community Gospel Choir – totalitarian motto: “Out of many, one voice!” – serenaded those who attended the memorial service in London, at which a grieving jigaboo mother called Marie Fatayi-Williams was the public face of loss. JuLabour’s “Secretary of State for Culture” Tessa Jowell, whose “estranged” husband is facing trial in Italy for corruption, was also in attendance to describe the 52 victims as “loved and loving.” Out of many, one slimy platitude.
But no-one who spoke at the memorial hinted even slightly at the truth: that the 52 victims were a drop in the ocean of death and suffering caused by Britain’s non-white guests over the past half-century. The London bombings are merely the most graphic sign so far that we are heading for disaster. And of course the more obvious the consequences of Britain’s race and immigration policies become, the faster the Jew-crew’s propaganda machine is pumping out lies. The jigaboo Archbishop of York John Sentamu, himself another potent symbol of Britain’s coming destruction, has offered the following helpful advice to Britain’s Whites:
Symbol of coming destruction:
Jigaboo bishop “Dr” John Sentamu
Call for love to fight terrorism
In his presidential address to the Church of England’s ruling body, Dr Sentamu said it was not enough to rely on security services and laws alone. Instead the country needed to “out-imagine, out-plan and out-think” would-be bombers, he told the General Synod at York University. This could be done by building an “inclusive circle of love”, he said. Dr Sentamu said neighbourhoods which were flourishing, safe, clean and generous needed to be created. He also said the grievances of would-be bombers needed to be tackled.
He said: “Offering a vision of wholeness in a compelling and imaginative way that is so persuasive that would-be bombers would come to see this as their own vision. A vision that would turn them from outsiders, self-excluding and deluded despisers of others, into belongers. A vision which will help them to see that those they seek to destroy are their own brothers and sisters regardless of their religious affiliations. The way to do this is by drawing a large enough circle of love which includes them and us.” (BBC News, 8th July 2006)
All Whites need is love. All non-whites need is high explosive. Care to place a bet on who’s going to win?