Heil-Hound On Their Track

Let’s paws for thought. First, imagine a wolf. Second, imagine a chihuahua. Third, consider this fact: they belong to the same species. Not to similar species, but to the same species: the former is Canis lupus and the latter Canis lupus familiaris. Wolves and chihuahuas are very close cousins, having differentiated in an eyeblink of evolutionary time. They prove what Marxists and their liberal dupes have long sought to deny for humans: that tiny genetic differences can have very big consequences for bodies, brains and behavior. And the differences get even tinier when you consider what separates chihuahuas from other breeds of dog. From the highly intelligent border collie to the charming but stupid Afghan hound, from the giant St Bernard to the dwarvish corgi, from the gentle labrador to the aggressive pitbull: the DNA behind the huge variety of dog-breeds is almost identical. For “breed”, read “race.” Human DNA is almost identical too, but tiny differences still have very big consequences for our bodies, brains and behavior. If race doesn’t exist, then neither do dog-breeds. But dog-breeds do exist and so does race. The denying and the duping will continue for some time yet, but have no doubt about it: the Twilight of the Goulds is upon us.

The late Stephen Jay Gould was a Marxist who labored long and hard to deny the truth about race and IQ. The living Steven Rose, Richard Lewontin and Leon Kamin continue his work. The paradox is that the leading race-deniers prove the importance of race, because they all belong to that tiny minority known as Jews. So did Marx, Freud and Boas. Jews are very good at duping and deceiving, at creating seductive ideologies to fool naïve whites into acting against their own interests. Jews fool and rule; whites swallow and follow. And there are genetic reasons for this. Tiny differences in DNA don’t account just for a highly significant Jewish advantage in verbal IQ, but also for a highly significant Jewish advantage in arrogance, ethnocentrism and disregard for objective truth. Jews preach equality and universalism while ruthlessly pursuing their own advantage and enrichment. That’s how they’ve come to dominate white societies and that’s why they’ve led the race-denial crusade. The Jewish boxer has been fighting with lead in his gloves and doesn’t want them examined. But his cheating is about to be unmasked: the referee has blown his whistle and the gloves are being unlaced. In other words, science is providing stronger and stronger evidence for the existence and importance of race. Studies like this are just the beginning:

Researchers discovered genetic evidence that human evolution is speeding up – and has not halted or proceeded at a constant rate, as had been thought – indicating that humans on different continents are becoming increasingly different. “We used a new genomic technology to show that humans are evolving rapidly, and that the pace of change has accelerated a lot in the last 40,000 years, especially since the end of the Ice Age roughly 10,000 years ago,” says research team leader Henry Harpending, a distinguished professor of anthropology at the University of Utah. Harpending says there are provocative implications from the study, published online Monday, Dec. 10 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:

• “We aren’t the same as people even 1,000 or 2,000 years ago,” he says, which may explain, for example, part of the difference between Viking invaders and their peaceful Swedish descendants. “The dogma has been these are cultural fluctuations, but almost any temperament trait you look at is under strong genetic influence.”

• “Human races are evolving away from each other,” Harpending says. “Genes are evolving fast in Europe, Asia and Africa, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single, mixed humanity.” He says that is happening because humans dispersed from Africa to other regions 40,000 years ago, “and there has not been much flow of genes between the regions since then.”

“Our study denies the widely held assumption or belief that modern humans [those who widely adopted advanced tools and art] appeared 40,000 years ago, have not changed since and that we are all pretty much the same. We show that humans are changing relatively rapidly on a scale of centuries to millennia, and that these changes are different in different continental groups.” (“Are Humans Evolving Faster?”, University of Utah press release, 10th December 2007)

And guess who’s leading race realism? Members of the race that respects objective truth and that created all the modern sciences. Whites, in other words. Even the whites who support race denial do so because they’ve been fooled into thinking that it is objective truth. Gould insisted that human equality was a “contingent fact of history.” It could have been different, inequality could have evolved instead in a hundred different ways, but somehow that just didn’t happen. And reader, I confess it: I was one of Gould’s gullible goyim. He and his Mismeasure of Man (1981) took me in for a time and I remember with shame how I once argued that even if blacks were less intelligent than whites for genetic reasons, we shouldn’t say so, because that kind of thinking was dangerous. You see, if we admit that race exists, we may end up in Auschwitz. I didn’t think back then that if we deny that race exists, we may end up in the Gulag. Nor did I think about other consequences of race denial: for example, its use to justify mass immigration, which has flooded white homelands with non-whites from a rich variety of violent and corrupt Third World nations. And surprise, surprise, they’ve brought their violence and corruption with them.

Race denial has also justified the steady loss of freedom in white homelands. Express the wrong opinions about race in the UK or Europe and you’re in for a dawn raid from the thought police. And how Jews like Abraham Foxman would love the same thing to start happening in the US! Free speech was born in white societies and is dying with those societies, as Jews re-create the Marxist police states they feel safest in. If we let a paranoid, self-obsessed minority continue to write our laws and buy our politicians, we’ll soon see that the Berlin Wall didn’t fall to let freedom into the East, but to let tyranny into the West. And if you want to know what East Germany was like, I recommend a book called The File, written by a historian called Timothy Garton Ash. He’s a liberal idiot, as anyone who reads his articles for The Guardian will soon see, but he saw at first hand how much the Jewish ideology of communism valued power and privacy. It valued power immensely and privacy not at all. Ash himself was spied on constantly when he was in East Germany and the File of his title is his own. It was one of millions: the Stasi, or the East German secret police, didn’t just use all the technological apparatus of surveillance – phone-tapping, bugs, cameras – they blackmailed and bribed their way into the most intimate relationships, forcing friends to spy on friends, husbands on wives, wives on husbands, children on parents, parents on children. And Ash, for all his liberal stupidity, hasn’t shaken off that innate white respect for truth. He’s a committed anti-racist and no doubt believes firmly in “If we admit race exists, then we end up in Auschwitz”, but that didn’t stop him revealing these highly significant facts:

The sources the Stasi [Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, or Ministry for State Security] themselves considered most important were the “unofficial collaborators”, the IMs [Inoffiziale Mitarbeiten]. The numbers are extraordinary. According to internal records, in 1988 – the last “normal” year of the GDR [German Democratic Republic] – the Ministry for State Security had more than 170,000 “unofficial collaborators.” Of these, some 110,000 were regular informers, while the others were involved in “conspiratorial” services, such as lending their flats for secret meetings, or were simply listed as reliable contacts. The Ministry itself had over 90,000 full-time employees, of whom less than 5,000 were in the HVA [Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung, Main Administration Reconnaissance] foreign-intelligence wing. Setting the total figure against the adult population in the same year, this means that one out of every fifty adult East Germans had a direct connection with the secret police. The Nazis had nothing like as many. In 1941, the full-time staff of the Gestapo, the Nazis’ Secret State Police, for the vastly larger territory of Greater Germany, including Austria and what is today the Czech Republic, was less than 15,000. Even adding the Reich Security Service and other possibly comparable units, one can still not reach anything like the Stasi proportions. We have no national figures for the number of regular informers, but it seems clear that this was also very much smaller. Over its relatively short life, starting with real popular enthusiasm and ending with five-and-a-half years of war, the Third Reich could rely much more on voluntary denunciations – as I found in those dusty People’s Court files. In East Germany, the regime was never popular to start with, and the longer it went on the more it came to rely on this huge network of informers. (The File: A Personal History, Timothy Garton Ash, HarperCollins, London, 1997, chapter V, pp 74-5)

Because communism denies the truth and opposes human nature, it has to work much harder at oppression and suppression. Its ideological cousin political correctness is having the same effect on the West: the state defines and enforces Truth, and dissenters are made to suffer. If Ash were right-wing rather than left-wing, his comments about the Nazis’ being much more popular than the communists might have put him in the same place as this German dog-owner:

Dog’s Nazi salute lands owner in jail for five months

As a dog lover, Hitler would no doubt have been flattered – “Adolf” the part Alsatian mongrel was not only his namesake but also meticulously trained by his Berlin owner to raise his right paw in a Nazi salute every time the command “Heil Hitler!” was uttered. But in a country where giving the Nazi salute even in jest has been strictly verboten since 1945, Adolf’s canine tricks did not amuse the police or the judiciary. Yesterday his owner, a pensioner named as Roland T, was starting what seemed like a draconian prison term of five months for repeatedly displaying banned Nazi symbols. His pet was dispatched to one of the city’s animal homes. The dog was pictured in newspapers and on Der Spiegel magazine’s online site sitting in a kennel with the name “Adolf” chalked across its entrance.

Evamarie König, a spokeswoman for the kennel, said she hoped the animal would find a new home soon. “He is healthy and obedient and we think he will find another owner quickly because he is so famous,” she said. The dog is to be renamed Adi. Roland T and his dog first attracted the attention of police in 2003 when the dog saluted as part of his owner’s provocative public repertoires of banned Nazi gestures, including wearing Hitler T-shirts and chanting “Sieg Heil.” Earlier this year, judges ruled that Roland T should serve a prison term after suspended jail sentences and fines failed to dissuade him from continuing to display Nazi symbols. Months before going to jail he had threatened to have the dog put down after claiming that he could no longer afford dog food because of the fines. He said the dog, which he claimed had been born on Hitler’s birthday, would be put down on the anniversary of the Nazi leader’s death. (The Independent, 21st December 2007)

But you can’t define and enforce truth in science, or at least not for long, and the race-denying foundations of the PC tyranny are starting to crack. If you listen carefully, you might be able to hear liberal brains whirring as they try desperately to think of a way out. There are serious biologists who still believe that brain evolution in Homo sapiens ground to a screeching halt 40,000 years ago. It didn’t. Race exists, race matters, and whites, like everyone else, should try to preserve their racial line. Good qualities are lost or diluted by race-mixing, just as they are in mongrel dogs. If a highly intelligent border collie is crossed with another breed, the offspring will be less intelligent than collies. If an obedient labrador is crossed with another breed, the offspring will be less obedient than labradors. Cross-breeding in humans does similiar things to intelligence and respect for the law. That’s part of why mass immigration does us so much harm. Whites are physically and psychologically different from other races not just because of our environment but because of our genes. As more and more whites realize that, more and more of us are going to want our nations back. In 1980, East Germany looked very strong; by 1990, it was gone. PC looks very strong in 2007, but its Decade of Doom may already have begun.

LUKE O’FARRELL

---