THE O’FARRELL COLUMN
 
Luke O’Farrell earlier today     18th June 2006

Weeding Out Whitey

Mass Immigration as Biological Warfare



If you want to know your enemy, study his books. If your enemy is the Jew – and it should be for any sensible Gentile – the Old Testament book of Isaiah is a good place to start. Its megalomaniac promises that God’s Chosen will “reap where they have not sown” are an excellent insight into the Jews’ “Gimme, gimme, gimme” psychology. But the New Testament offers excellent insights into their psychology too. Whether or not Jesus was himself Jewish, he certainly knew a lot about Jewish culture and the tricks Jews like to use against their own enemies:

Once a man sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone slept, his enemy came and sowed weeds, and went his way. When the good seed sprang up and brought forth fruit, then the weeds sprang up too. (Gospel of Matthew, 13:24-6)

This passage demonstrates the huge advantage of biological warfare: all you need to do is introduce the agent and then watch as it wages war on your behalf. Seeds are easy to carry, conceal and sow. After that, you can leave it to nature: the weeds will spring up and choke your enemy’s crop. And is exactly what Jews have been doing with mass immigration in Europe and America: they are sowing weeds in their White enemy’s fields to choke his society and culture. Non-whites are their biological agents and Jews can sit back and watch as those agents wage war on their behalf using Jew-forged ideological weapons.

For example, if you look at modern far-left groups in Britain, you’ll find that they’re full of Asians. Take the Trotskyist Unite Against Fascism group currently waging war against the free speech of Leeds University’s “racist” lecturer Frank Ellis. It’s run by the Socialist Workers Party, as founded by the Jew Ygael Gluckstein, and recruits heavily from non-whites who long to destroy White Britain and its traditions of free speech and free intellectual enquiry:

Students and staff protest against lecturer’s race views

The campaign against a university lecturer who claims that black people and women are genetically inferior is spreading to campuses around the country following a demonstration in Leeds yesterday. Frank Ellis, a lecturer in Russian and Slavonic studies, sparked anger after stating he was an “unrepentant Powellite” who thought the BNP was “a bit too socialist” for his liking.

Yesterday more than 300 students and staff gathered in Leeds to call for him to be sacked and campaigners said the struggle was picking up momentum at other universities. Hind Hassan, treasurer of Unite Against Fascism at Leeds University, said: “This is a fight that is going to go on and on until we get rid of this man. It has gone beyond an issue of freedom of speech or academic freedom and now directly impinges on the rights of students to live and work in a safe and tolerant environment. How can female students or those from ethnic minorities possibly get a fair educational experience?”

Students from several universities attended the rally. Shaheed Fazal, who travelled from Warwick University, said: “It is completely inappropriate for a lecturer in his position to push these views.” Pav Aktar, National Union of Students anti-racism organiser, said the campaign was gathering national momentum. “For someone in a senior position to validate racist and fascist opinions on campus represents a real danger to all students, not just those at Leeds.” (The Guardian, 17th March 2006)

Leeds students campaign to kick out the racist lecturer Frank Ellis

by Hanif Leylabi

The campaign against Dr Frank Ellis, lecturer in Russian and Slavonic studies at Leeds University, is growing. He has a history of racism, homophobia and sexism. The reaction on campus to Ellis’s abhorrent views has been one of horror and outrage. Many hundreds of signatures have been collected on a petition calling for him to be sacked as part of the student led campaign to remove him from his position. Ethnic minority students in particular have been rightly disgusted by Ellis’s racist views.

We have received messages of support from a wide range of different groups on campus including the Jewish Society and the Afro-Caribbean Society along with the full backing of Leeds University union, reflecting the breadth of our campaign. The Unite Against Fascism society on campus, which has been at the forefront of the campaign to sack Ellis, called a demonstration on Thursday. We shall continue building our campaign and we will take direct action if necessary. The message from our demonstration was loud and clear. An attack on one student is an attack on all students and we are here, black and white, united against your racist bilge. Dr Frank Ellis, your days as a lecturer are numbered. (Socialist Worker, 25th March 2006)

Look at the astonishing arrogance of a non-white issuing threats to a White for peacefully expressing his opinions. But the truth about racial differences is bad for Jews and thanks to the mass immigration they’ve inflicted on Britain there are countless non-whites who will fight against the truth for them. Jews just have to supply the lies and their non-white agents will eagerly use them against Whites. The concept of “racism” is one of the most important of these lies. As defined by Jews, racism is a Whites-only disease. In characteristic Jewish fashion, they’ve inverted the truth: Whites are actually the least racist of all groups. After all, would the Indians and Chinese not only allow their nations to be invaded by aliens but give those aliens special advantages and privileges at the expense of their own race?

Of course not. And that applies in spades to the biggest racists and xenophobes of all: the Jews themselves. In Israel, the special advantages and privileges belong to the majority and Jews don’t intend to let that majority be weakened and overthrown. After all, they are the majority. In Britain, by contrast, they work night and day to weaken and overthrow the majority, because the majority is non-Jewish. Not only that, they make the majority pay for the privilege of being attacked. Whites in Britain have to fund the BBC through the television license fee and the BBC is perhaps the biggest single purveyor of anti-White and anti-male propaganda in Britain. Can you guess what race its Chairman, its “Creative” Director, its Director of Radio and many of its other senior managers are?

Got it in one: they’re Jews. That tiny minority is hugely over-represented at the top, so is it any wonder the BBC is so relentlessly anti-White? It’s as if the Israeli Broadcasting Corporation were controlled by Eskimos and pumped out non-stop anti-Jewish, pro-Arab propaganda. But of course the IBC isn’t controlled by Eskimos, because Jews know that those who wish to control their own nation must control its media too. Whites don’t control the British media, which is why they don’t control their own nation any more either. Lower down, the BBC swarms with anti-White, anti-male biological-warfare agents like the Asian journalist Tanya Datta, who recently pondered the very low rates of intermarriage between two of Britain’s oppressed minorities:

Thrown together through the history of colonialism and post-war immigration, Britain’s black and Asian people have lived alongside each other for decades in many major cities. But although they share a history of struggle against racism, concealed underneath are deep and ugly fault lines – fault lines that can split apart when people from these two communities fall in love with each other. Despite the UK having one of the fastest-growing mixed race populations in the world, the overwhelming majority of inter-ethnic married couples in England and Wales include a white person. (BBC News, 12th June 2006)

These “deep and ugly fault lines” are in fact racism between blacks and Asians, but Tanya can’t bring herself to use the word or to acknowledge that Whites are far less racist than either of these two groups. Just watch her weasel as she tries to evade the truth:

While antagonisms over relationships tend to be a personal matter played out between and among families, tensions do however run a lot deeper between the Asian and the Black communities. Last October, violence exploded on to the streets of the Birmingham suburb of Lozells as young black and Asian men clashed over what remains an unsubstantiated rumour of rape. As riots tore apart the ethnically mixed neighbourhood, a young black IT worker, Isaiah Young-Sam, was fatally stabbed. Three Asian men were sentenced to life imprisonment in May for the racially-motivated murder. The events of October have caused a lot of soul-searching among the communities affected, with questions raised about how much do [sic] black and Asian people really communicate in modern Britain.

Antagonisms... tensions... failure to communicate... In other words: racism! But Tanya’s dishonesty is easy to understand. The lie underlying official race ideology in Britain is that racism is exclusive to Whites. This lie is far too useful to be discarded, because it allows non-whites to evade all responsibility for their own failings. Tell the truth about Jews and they shriek “Anti-Semitism!” Similarly, tell the truth about non-whites and they shriek “Racism!”

Secret report brands Muslim police corrupt

A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that Muslim officers are more likely to become corrupt than white officers because of their cultural and family backgrounds. The document, which has been seen by the Guardian, has caused outrage among ethnic minorities within the force, who have labelled it racist and proof that there is a gulf in understanding between the police force and the wider Muslim community. The document was written as an attempt to investigate why complaints of misconduct and corruption against Asian officers are 10 times higher than against their white colleagues.

The main conclusions of the study, commissioned by the Directorate of Professional Standards and written by an Asian detective chief inspector, stated: “Asian officers and in particular Pakistani Muslim officers are under greater pressure from the family, the extended family ... and their community against that of their white colleagues to engage in activity that might lead to misconduct or criminality.” It recommended that Asian officers needed special anti-corruption training and is now being considered by a working party of senior staff. The report argued that British Pakistanis live in a cash culture in which “assisting your extended family is considered a duty” and in an environment in which large amounts of money are loaned between relatives and friends.

The first version [of the report] was considered so inflammatory when it was shown to representatives from the staff associations for black, Hindu, Sikh and Muslim officers, that it had to be toned down. There are 31,000 officers in the Met – 7%, or 2,170, are black and minority ethnic; among these an estimated 300 are Muslim. One Muslim officer with the Met said: “It is like saying black officers are more likely to be muggers. Today it is Muslim officers who are treated as the Uncle Toms. How can they say to the Muslim community ‘trust us,’ when they don’t even trust their own Muslim officers?” (The Guardian, 10th June 2006)

The reaction to this report is a perfect example of how Jews have corrupted public discourse in Britain. Jews have taught non-whites to demand “trust” from Whites without bothering to earn it. Thanks to their control of the media and politics, they can attack Whites constantly through organizations like the BBC and the lunatic Commission for Racial Equality. But the slightest breath of criticism against non-whites, however justified, produces “outrage.” Why can’t Whites understand that they are the problem? Why can’t Whites accept that Diversity blesses them each and every day in a million different ways?

Well, I’m a White and I can’t understand and accept those things because they’re lies. The “race problem” in Britain and other White nations is caused by non-whites being where they don’t belong. Diversity is not a blessing but a curse. It’s a form of biological warfare used by Jews to fulfil their age-old racial instincts: to weaken, exploit and destroy the majority of any Gentile society they find themselves in. Only lunatics or liberals could believe that our Jew-devised policies on race and immigration will be anything other than disastrous, and Israel’s own policies show that Jews themselves don’t practise what they preach. That’s because they know that what they preach to the gullible goyim is pure poison.

LUKE O’FARRELL


Click here for O’Farrell archive