‘You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.’

‘A Real Case Against the Jews,’ Marcus Eli Ravage, The Century Magazine, January 1928, Vol. 115, No. 3 pp. 346-350. Part 2 appeared in the following issue, pp.476-483.

Some of the following appears in All About Women because as usual we refer not to females particularly but to female policies. Some procedures which are often employed by Jews, but detailed elsewhere, are Malign Encouragement, Creative Transduction and projecting their own unconscious or undesirable tendencies onto their opponents (Freudian Projection).

1. The Biological Analogy

Richard Dawkins provides several examples of how cunning parasites can be, and how easy it is to be fooled. The sophistication of some ant species makes the cuckoo look like a novice. He describes a parasitic ant which invades a neighbouring colony, seeks out its queen, climbs on top of it and methodically gnaws off its head. Having usurped the position at the top of this social hierarchy, the alien queen produces eggs which are tended by the invaded colonies’ workers, and new queens then go off to invade other colonies.

Even this strategy has been improved upon by another ant species. To quote The Selfish Gene, p. 252 (Dawkins is here referring to the founder of sociobiology, Edward Wilson):

‘But sawing off heads is a bit of a chore. Parasites are not accustomed to exerting themselves if they can coerce a stand-in. My favourite character in Wilson’s The Insect Societies is Monomorium santschii. This species, over evolutionary time, has lost its worker caste altogether. The host workers do everything for their parasites, even the most terrible task of all. At the behest of the invading parasite queen, they actually perform the deed of murdering their own mother. The usurper doesn’t need to use her jaws. She uses mind-control. How she does it is a mystery; she probably employs a chemical, for ant nervous systems are generally highly attuned to them. If her weapon is indeed chemical, then it is as insidious a drug as any known to science. For think what it accomplishes. It floods the brain of the worker ant, grabs the reins of her muscles, woos her from deeply ingrained duties and turns her against her own mother. For ants, matricide is an act of special genetic madness and formidable indeed must be the drug that drives them to it. In the world of the extended phenotype, ask not how an animal’s behaviour benefits its genes; ask instead whose genes it is benefiting.’

‘We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.’ Rabbi Reichorn in Le Contemporain, July 1, 1880

2. Loss of Jewish Worker Caste

Note that the Jews lost their peasantry (worker caste) around 1,000 AD. This is documented by Shahak in Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 52-53 and is clearly evident today. Shahak is unable to explain how this change in Jewish social structure came about, but it is hypothesized that the evolution of the following traits is involved:

1. Love of being above someone (e.g. gloating);
2. Abhorrence of being looked down upon.

Jews appear to be capable of getting themselves appointed to government positions, elected onto academic editorial committees etc., without any formal role or qualifications.

‘The Jew alone regards his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.’ Goldwin Smith, Professor of Modern History, Oxford University, in Nineteenth Century, October 1881

3. Control of the Media. Examples. Use of Women

Jews employ the same strategy as Monomorium santchii by their control of the media. For the facts about the enormous Jewish influence in television, films, newspaper publishing etc. in America see the National Vanguard publication Who Rules America?, in Britain the BNP publication The Mind-Benders.

Using this control they define fashions and promote mores which derogate those who seek to preserve Occidental culture. The policy, specifically, is to stigmatize potential or actual leaders (of thought or action) and manipulate others to attack them.

As one example of that influence the present writer, Simon Sheppard has, merely for expressing opinions, been beaten up, prosecuted under the Public Order Act, endured numerous other forms of harassment, been banned from every public library in his home town of Hull and also banned from:

Although publishers in the Hull area can be counted on one hand, in the several years the Heretical Press has been in existence there has been no review of any HP publication in any local newspaper. The Heretical Press was excluded from a list of Hull websites maintained by the local telephone company. Thus the vast majority of people simply do not know that the Heretical Press exists, just as they do not know that another side exists to the Holocaust story. If any pages on this website tend to forthrightness, it is a completely natural reaction to the dishonest and underhand methods which are being used to suppress the truth.

It hardly needs stating that most people, when faced with such determined opposition, would choose to “bend with the wind” for an easy life. This is, perhaps, why leaders are such a threat. Other Nationalists, Revisionists etc. have had similar experiences:

Thousands of men are imprisoned unjustly because their instinct to rebel is valid but they are denied the information they need to direct their rebellion constructively. Consistently 97% of the prison population is male.

Note that Jews promote feminism via the media, particularly by the use of artificial media role models (AMRM’s: empowering females to further act against males by giving them dishonest stereotypes to emulate is another form of Malign Encouragement). Like supports like; females conspire (act together); ‘the gene is selfish.’ Because of their emotional and impressionable natures women are a complete pushover for Jews to manipulate, so it is in the Jewish interest to deliver as much power to them as possible. Jews support women and women support Jews; but while females’ optimal policy is Disguised Defection, the most advantageous policy for Jews is Disguised Invasion.

Due to the Jewish promotion of women we have the situation (in Britain at least) in which women incapable of repairing a bicycle puncture are driving around in fashion wagons chatting on mobile telephones while millions of their menfolk are unemployed. Big Sister’s policy is to derogate, assault, stigmatize, reduce to poverty, drive to suicide, deprive of medical treatment, refuse compensation for criminal attacks, silence and, if possible, imprison any Occidental male who threatens to expose their cosy parasitic scams.