Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males
In this short article I wish to detail the phenomenon, which many nationalists and others will surely have noticed, of the female tendency to favour immigrant males. During my investigations into human behaviour, documented in my recently published book The Tyranny of Ambiguity, I surveyed this phenomenon, sitting at the side of a Dutch shopping mall with a clipboard. Its essentially female origin was confirmed and moreover, the trait appeared to be common to females of all ages and social classes.
No doubt many individuals have advanced their own theories as to the origins of this behaviour but the reality is that the sources of it are complex: no single explanation suffices. Although the policy of the mass media is Malign Encouragement, encouraging an opponent to pursue an adverse policy (Table 1), this phenomenon cannot be the product of media influence alone. One technique is to promote artificial media role models (AMRM’s; successful businesswomen, swaggering female police officers and the like) but to a large extent the media encourages detrimental traits and behaviours which already exist. I shall therefore list a number of elements which have been isolated, with the actual origins in each case being a mixture of one or more of these components.
|Table 1. Policy Choices for a Protagonist|
|MINIMIZE OPPONENT’S PAYOFF||MAXIMIZE OPPONENT’S PAYOFF|
|MINIMIZE OWN PAYOFF||Loser||Pure altruism|
|MAXIMIZE OWN PAYOFF||Malign Encouragement||Perfect symbiosis|
The following discussion derives from a new system of human behaviour analysis proposed by this author called Procedural Analysis (see Table 2). It is not claimed that all females prefer immigrant males, but that it is the female policy. Here we deal not with individuals but with male and female policies, according to whether the policy or procedure serves the furtherance of male or female genes.1 For example, the optimal male policy for the furtherance of his genes is to impregnate as many reproductive females as possible. The optimal female policy is to secure a single, long-term mate of exceptional fitness who will stay with her and provide for her while she rears children.
|Table 2. Basic categories of procedure|
|SIGNAL (F)||A gesture, particularly of sexual one serving to attract a mate||The Accident Signal, which is a prompt for male aid, from a relationship and progeny may result|
|MARKER (M)||An unambiguous indication of involvement||Talking to someone; buying someone a drink; a female mending or ironing her mate’s clothes. Primoridial marking is leaving scent|
|TOKEN (F)||When one thing means another||An invitation for a cup of coffee; traditionally, it is an invitation to share in the ritual of its preparation, and to talk|
|HANDLE (M)||A request which evokes a fixed and predetermined response||Calling someone’s name. A condition in which handles are issued (e.g. being married) is called a handle state|
The male/female game is the game of opposites: the male instinct is to compete (maximizing fitness) while the female instinct is to conspire (raising the cost of sex, enforcing monogamy). Applying this simple yet powerful and most important of all, accurate model, the male instinct is to be racist (because it is males who fight to protect territory and to retain the racial integrity of the tribe), so therefore the female instinct is to be “anti-racist.” Similarly the female instinct on seeing a mixed race couple is to smile approvingly while the true, deep male instinct is homicidal.
In an environment where male influence is strong, females will conform to male expectations; but in a society where masculine influence is diminishing, race-mixing by females will become increasingly prevalent. This is plainly evident in areas where there is a high proportion of coloured immigrants. Those females who would not enter into this behaviour (and the majority would, given the opportunity and an environment that is amenable to it) are actually exhibiting a masculine characteristic.
It is noteworthy that none of the following components are transient; they are not mere whims of fashion. The following list of origins was arrived upon:
The second level Psychic Assault is capable of arousing intense distaste in males, however subconsciously that sense has been submerged, and this is another method by which sex can be limited and its value raised. The female policy is to raise the costs of sex, the male instinct is to lower it. By the second level Psychic Assault the male is confounded and rendered yet more susceptible to manipulation. It is one of many procedures which the female executes personally but with considerable benefit to females generally (the Conspiracy policy). She derives satisfaction from following her instincts in this way and by further depriving her own males of sex she is collectively increasing female power and the control and influence they can exact.
Females’ explorations with immigrants, which may initially be for novelty, become a self-perpetuating cycle. After the period of novelty has passed, only immigrant males allow females the level of control and increased latitude to which they become accustomed. Put another way, the revulsion this and their other behaviour (deriving from their increased power, Item 1) arouses in their menfolk becomes such that only immigrants will put up with them.
One report, which is unverified, is of Celtic women dancing naked on a hilltop while their menfolk battled a challenging tribe below. Whatever the outcome, the women could be confident of being ravished by the victors. For the female, two males fighting for her might be the ultimate in IoR.
|Table 3. Formal definition of the Psychic (or Mental) Assault|
There may be an unresolved issue as to why women appear more willing to be submissive to an immigrant than would be the case in a relationship with a white man. This may be accountable by reference to Item 6, combined with a psychologist’s observation that females express guilt concerning their behaviour towards other females, children and animals but never in respect of their actions towards males (also bearing in mind DRoFC).
Examining (as always) the situation in evolutionary terms, for the male on the individual level, a female he supported who bore a visibly different child would likely be ejected from the cave or dwelling, if not from the entire tribe, and thereafter she would be left to fend for herself. (Protecting herself from such an eventuality is a likely origin of Vicarious Generosity.) The male might even have been supporting older members of her family and he would feel entirely justified in giving short shrift to a wife who gave her favours to another.
On the collective level, millions of males have suffered brutal deaths in battles fought to preserve differences; all those who had been left to perish at the scene of some bloody battle, after receiving a sword in the stomach or a grievous wound with a blunter weapon. After such costs have been incurred by his forebears the sight of one of the females of his tribe making herself available to a male of a strange and different one is an affront.
For a white male and an alien female there is a slightly different situation. Firstly, there is Affection Beneath to consider, and this is the reason why this circumstance is less abhorrent to the instincts than the opposite case. Nonetheless such a union is a feminine expression of DSoD (“Dee-sod”; see Table 4) and its prevalence, which is much less common than white females with alien males, evidence of feminization in any event.
|Table 4. Components of the DSoD (Dishonest Submergence of Difference) Theory|
|AMSoSD:||The Actual Male Submersion of Small Differences|
|EFPoSD:||The Enhanced Female Perception of Small Differences|
|IMAoLD:||The Inordinate Male Amplification of Large Differences|
|DFSoLD:||The Dishonest Female Submersion of Large Differences|
It is important to appreciate that females are not naïve in sexual matters and particularly in the matter of sexual selection. Sexual selection is absolutely essential to her being. Many behaviours which are learnt (i.e. acquired) in the male are inherent in the female; this explains the many and varied sexual aberrations in males, such as fetishes. The female is regularly reminded, by menstruation, of her reproductive function.
While the male excels at manipulating things, the female imitates him. To the female, relationships are sex and it is her natural domain, so males will often imitate the female. (This and a male need to express Affection Beneath largely accounts for white male/immigrant female couples such as men with mail-order wives.) Although the immigrant is a successful invader, he is evidently not so by his masculine prowess and females who choose a mate of alien race know precisely the extent of their betrayal. This accounts for the often extreme reaction they give when criticism is implied. A female taking such a partner is the sexual-political equivalent of the nuclear bomb (cf. the etymology of bikini).2
When male animals fight, they usually fight for territory. They may fight virtually, and only posture and threaten, but it is still a struggle for dominance. The loser retreats, surrendering his claim on the territory. The point is that in nature, females come with the territory. A male that dominates a territory also dominates, controls and mates with the females within it. In human society, the fact that females have language and intelligence only enables them to employ specious arguments to justify their actions, as in the case of the alien takeover of our territory.
Being humans, we are capable of acting against our instincts, but following our natural drives is our “default mode.” To defy them requires effort, which we will prefer to avoid. Happiness generally results from following our instincts, almost by definition, and the pursuit of happiness must certainly be the leading human activity.
It gives me no satisfaction to say this, but there is not much wrong with females that controlled, restrained physical force would not correct. The female has evolved numerous mechanisms to compensate for her physical weakness relative to the male. If the male is denied the ability to respond with force (or at least, the tangible threat of force) he is at a disadvantage and simply cannot counter females’ natural manipulative skill or, more apposite to this discussion, retaliate for the supreme insult he is delivered. Thus we have the situation where a white female can flaunt her relationship with a Negro or other immigrant male in a public or semi-public place (such as a pub or bar) with the male prohibited by law from responding. The institutionalised favouring of immigrants, and legal protection of females from a natural masculine response to their excesses, is indicative of the Super Feminine State or, as it may otherwise be known, ‘Big Sister.’
If their behaviour is unlimited, females are capable of firstly, making their own males into an underclass, for example by their wholesale preference for alien males, as can readily be observed in areas with high immigrant populations. Secondly, they are capable of taking their race to the brink of, if not beyond, extinction. These are critical flaws for which accommodation cannot be countenanced.
Woman is the human reproductive animal, and all her instincts are concerned with raising the costs of sex, securing a mate and child-rearing. Giving her power to apply these instincts to wider society is not appropriate. The sexual behaviours of women, and Vicarious Generosity, point to a feminine source of the original problem of mass coloured immigration.
1. Note on definitions: In this system a policy is defined as a set of procedures; a procedure will be capable of being expressed mathematically. Use of the term strategy is problematic because in mathematical game theory a strategy is defined as a complete specification of what an individual will do in any situation, which for humans is generally unattainable. The Protagonist in game theory is the player who starts the game.
2. The bikini was so named because its effect on males was compared to the effect of the nuclear bombs being tested at the time at Bikini Atoll.
First published in the November 2002 edition of Spearhead magazine under the title ‘Why many white women prefer non-white males.’ This title is slightly incorrect however, since the phenomenon has been reported to occur elsewhere, for example in Japan.